[jennyp]

The information I have read concerning Kent Hovind by no means makes me baulk at his presentation or his integrity. (I have perused many anti-Hovind sights and they are juvenile. None attempt to examine the body of evidence he presents with any merit).

Here's an anti-Hovind article you cannot wish away.

[bondserv]

I will admit I didn't read the entire article, but I would fall on the side of Hovind in this arguement.

What I immediately picked up from AIG is their desire to be the determiner if an arguement is valid or not, and whether the "new information" pertaining to that topic refutes the old arguement.

I will read the rest of the article when I get time, but I disagree with AIG's attempt to OVERSEE all other ministries relating to apologetics or creation.

A Christian principle, that is biblical, is to call to account those in the body, but within the church. That is why it is forbidden to sue another Christian. Not all Christians abide by this principle however.

I personally have an apologetics ministry of which I refuse to publically criticize the errors that I may think AIG may have made.

At the point of disagreement is where this should have ended.