[Rudder]

Evolutionary theory is well-supported by scientific evidence (data). Any alternative to any theory must, to exist as credible to science, have data to support it. ID theory has no scientific data to support it.

[ALS]

"ID theory has no scientific data to support it"

Merely an opinion, and a narrow minded one at that.

Worry about proving evolution before you worry about something you admittingly know nothing of.

[johnwayne]

I don't believe Intelligent Design is a provible theory. However, it does bring up legitimate questions, those mentioned in Darwin's Black Box, which should be addressed in the context of evolutionary theory.

[ApesForEvolution]

The fact that you are (apparently) here, on earth, living, is plenty of evidence to support the theory.

In truth, it takes more faith to believe in the contrived convolutionists' theories (ever changing, ever lying, ever deceiving, ever trying to disprove their Creator) than ID does.

[Timmy]

Evolutionary theory is well-supported by scientific evidence (data).

No, it is not. It has years of propaganda and indoctrination behind it, but little (if any) reliable "proof." Even the pro-evos on this board often concede this dark little secret. The strongest support for evolution is a pre-existing rejection of God. Since there is no God, it must have happened somehow. There is no proof in the fossil record, there is no proof in nature. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Now, of course, we will have our posters with their highly speculative "proofs" come on the board, but Darwin was right when he stated there must be enormous evidence in the fossil record to support his theory, and that the absence of such evidence was a huge problem for himt. He thought it would prove out over time. Over a hundred years later, it hasn't. If evolution by speciation were true, it should show itself everywhere and there would be no debate.

[JudgemAll]

Evolutionary theory is well-supported by scientific evidence (data). Any alternative to any theory must, to exist as credible to science, have data to support it. ID theory has no scientific data to support it.

Wrong. ID has been corroborated by atheist scientists, indicating that evolution does not follow the full chaotic pattern of Darwin, but chaos with a strange attractor. Hence evolution carries its very own DNA like program.

[JudgemAll]

Evolutionary theory is well-supported by scientific evidence (data). Any alternative to any theory must, to exist as credible to science, have data to support it. ID theory has no scientific data to support it.

Wrong. ID has been corroborated by atheist scientists, indicating that evolution does not follow the full chaotic pattern of Darwin, but chaos with a strange attractor. Hence evolution carries its very own DNA like program.

Check the work by D'Ambricourt.