Yeah... I just scanned through. Aside from Bellflower's "must be a parody cause no one is this ignorant" post #518, not much to see new here.
Eric2000, for evolution to be true there should be countless transitional fossils for every fully arrived creature fossil not the other way around. Doesn't your theory say that it took many, many mutations and much survival of the fittest in order for one species to progress into a different more evolved specie. There would have to be coutless fossils of many odd creatures on their way to becoming a species that just didn't make it. Creatures with stubs for wings and partially formed eyeballs, creatures with all kinds of odd combinations and things we would never have imagined existing. Where are the these countless failures that should be overabundunt in supply compared to the few that actually made it? Eric2000, for evolution to be true there should be countless transitional fossils for every fully arrived creature fossil not the other way around. Doesn't your theory say that it took many, many mutations and much survival of the fittest in order for one species to progress into a different more evolved specie. There would have to be coutless fossils of many odd creatures on their way to becoming a species that just didn't make it. Creatures with stubs for wings and partially formed eyeballs, creatures with all kinds of odd combinations and things we would never have imagined existing. Where are the these countless failures that should be overabundunt in supply compared to the few that actually made it?
Yeah... I just scanned through. Aside from Bellflower's "must be a parody cause no one is this ignorant" post #518, not much to see new here.
whattajoke, could you please without any condescendtion or sarcasm explain in logical terms and in a lucid fashion exactly why you disagree with what I said. Thank you, Bellflower