[Rudder]

First you say:
No, it is not. It has years of propaganda and indoctrination behind it, but little (if any) reliable "proof." Even the pro-evos on this board often concede this dark little secret. The strongest support for evolution is a pre-existing rejection of God. Since there is no God, it must have happened somehow. There is no proof in the fossil record, there is no proof in nature.

Then later you say:
Where is the "support" (note I did not use the word "proof")?

You know...you lost me with this. You just aren't keeping your thoughts together tonight, denying what you said in print is an impossible position to defend.

As for your request for the "support" of the theory of evolution here goes: Origin of the Species: Darwin, C.

Hey, it's a beginning of a long journey of what will be reading 144 years' of accumulated data which support the theory of evolution. Sorry, I don't have the time or space to put it all here in front of you.

[Timmy]

I noted that I did not use the word "proof", which you didn't like, in my SECOND post. As for Darwin's book and theory, I am quite certain I know it as well (probably much better) than you. I also know the other side. You state there is ample 'support' for the theory. However, we all know (assuming you are, indeed, knowledgeable in this area) there is nothing in the fossil record or visible in nature. I was just wondering if you had found something unbeknownst to the rest of us. Evidently not.