Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry; balrog666; Dimensio; Junior; jennyp; Ichneumon; RadioAstronomer; ...
OK guys, let the fun begin...
2 posted on 06/22/2003 5:32:02 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000; PatrickHenry; balrog666; Dimensio; Junior; jennyp; Ichneumon; RadioAstronomer
I was reading an article today that I realized was relevant, to the Evolution / Intelligent Design discussions.

In 1677 Olaf Roemer, the Danish astronomer, noted that the time elapsed between eclipses of Jupiter with its moons became shorter as the Earth moved closer to Jupiter and became longer as the Earth and Jupiter drew farther apart. This anomalous behavior could be accounted for by a finite speed of light.

Initially, Roemer's suggestion was hooted at. It took another half century for the notion to be accepted.

It apparently is normal for the scientific community to "hoot" at new ideas. Even when the existing theories don't adequately account for observed anomalies.

Thus ID advocates should actually expect the rude behavior they receive from evolutionists. Evolutionists are merely following centuries old so-called "scientific" tradition of hooting at any new concept.

80 posted on 06/22/2003 6:36:13 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
rwp ...

"That's a historical accident, dating from when science was known as natural philosophy. It's an anachronism. As science has progressed, and philosophy has vortexed down into its own navel, the idea that philosophy somehow includes science is ever more untenable."

"Hardly any science textbook at the college level even mentions philosophy. Virtually no published scientific papers cite a single philosophical reference. Not much of a cornerstone."

fC ...

Anarchy <== undernatural speculation - DENIAL - knowledge (( philosophy )) - technology // SCIENCE ==> design !

Evolution is groundless -- no philosophical or technical foundation !

rwp (( my additions )) ...

As EVOLUTION * * (( science )) has progressed,

and philosophy (( science // civilization )) * * has vortexed down into its own navel,

the idea that philosophy somehow ... EXCLUDES * * --- (( includes )) science

is ever more untenable.

... * * ... my additions !

419 posted on 06/22/2003 9:59:17 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
To: plain talk

Unfortunately some people are just too lazy to study and accept the revealed word of God in the Bible but yet ... will accept such a sloppy notion of science --- which amounts to throwing a bunch of stuff together and sh!t happens.

I LOVE IT! Excellant post! Thanks!

161 posted on 06/24/2003 12:56 AM PDT by Loose_Cannon1 (Part French and hating myself for it!!)

932 posted on 06/24/2003 1:37:44 AM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson