Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Aurelius
A better analogy in this particular case would be that the husband's primary motive in forcing his wife back was to retain control over her paycheck.

Except in this case all the seceeding states complained first and foremost about the loss of their beloved institution of slavery.

It's funny how you neo-confederates always try to reinvent history to forget the south's main war cry was the protection of slavery.

43 posted on 06/12/2003 8:20:49 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
No they don't try to forget it. They stridently shriek in the face of ALL fact that it never even occurred to the idiots who started the war that there were even any slaves there.

Our D.S.s all say "Slaves? What slaves? That is all a Yankee myth. It was all about tariffs, state rights, making the Mint Julip the National Drink." Anything but the obvious.
123 posted on 06/12/2003 12:37:06 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
If you took a laxative SIR,you would self destruct---the war was over STATES RIGHTS including the right to buy from EUROPE without paying the onerous duties imposed by the NORTHERN INDUSTIALISTS
139 posted on 06/12/2003 2:42:47 PM PDT by y2k_free_radical (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson