Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
James Madison, in your opinion was an "unreasonable person," but what would he know about the constitution anyway?

"The nullifiers it appears, endeavor to shelter themselves under a distinction between a delegation and a surrender of powers. But if the powers be attributes of sovereignty & nationality & the grant of them be perpetual, as is necessarily implied, where not otherwise expressed, sovereignty & nationality are effectually transferred by it, and the dispute about the name, is but a battle of words. The practical result is not indeed left to argument or inference. The words of the Constitution are explicit that the Constitution & laws of the U. S. shall be supreme over the Constitution and laws of the several States; supreme in their exposition and execution as well as in their authority. Without a supremacy in those respects it would be like a scabbard in the hands of a soldier without a sword in it. The imagination itself is startled at the idea of twenty four independent expounders of a rule that cannot exist, but in a meaning and operation, the same for all."

- James Madison

I think Madison was -very-reasonable.

Walt

1,357 posted on 07/08/2003 7:03:16 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa (Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1347 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyPapa
I think Madison was -very-reasonable.

And to which nullifiers was Madison referring to in the quote you provided? Surely not himself!

1,366 posted on 07/08/2003 8:13:05 PM PDT by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson