To: MrLeRoy
Get serious. How many adolescent and pre-teen recreational drug users are there? The answer is NONE -every one of them is the victim of a crime. Yet, drug use among these young people goes on because it is abetted by the older dealers (and I also include mass growers and transporters in the same category). I have one kid in high school, two more in jr. high, and a fourth in elementary school. I know for a fact that there is drug use (primarilly marijuana and alcohol) in the jr. high schools. A baseball teammate of my son got busted in a locker search for pot. Someone, probably not unlike the college student in the post, facilitated that young person's drug use. There are victims - lots of them.
To: capitan_refugio
How many adolescent and pre-teen recreational drug users are there? The answer is NONE -every one of them is the victim of a crime. [...] I know for a fact that there is drug use (primarilly marijuana and alcohol) in the jr. high schools.OK. Is that a good argument for banning marijuana and alcohol for adults?
297 posted on
06/10/2003 1:16:55 PM PDT by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: capitan_refugio
How many adolescent and pre-teen recreational drug users are there?Ahh, yes ... the fallback of every Drug Warrior and Leftist when justifying their abuses of state power ... "the chillrun".
The answer is NONE -every one of them is the victim of a crime.
IIRC, convenience store clerks that are caught selling alcohol or tobacco to minors are FINED, not JAILED, for their offense of "victimizing" children.
Note to meddling nanny-staters: YOUR children are not an excuse for depriving ME of my liberties.
299 posted on
06/10/2003 1:25:17 PM PDT by
bassmaner
(Let's take back the word "liberal" from the commies!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson