[gore3000]

Dataman asserted that the theory of evolution makes some statement regarding the origins of life.

Abiogenesis was part of the theory of evolution until it was written off it by Huxley due to Pasteur's experiment showing that spontaneous generation was false. Darwin also played around with the idea but did not dare publish it. Abiogenesis is implicit in evolution since it denies totally a divine Creator and if there is a divine Creator there is no need for evolution, certainly there is no way that it can claim that all species (including man) have evolved instead of being created.

[Stultis]

if there is a divine Creator there is no need for evolution

Nice of you to offer your opinion, gore3000. If you'll excuse me, however, I'm going to leave it to the Creator Himself to decide whether there is a need (or preference) for evolution and/or abiogenesis.

[Dataman]

certainly there is no way that it can claim that all species (including man) have evolved instead of being created.

Postmodern evos can claim anything since, to them, both truth and monkeys are relative.

[Dimensio]

Abiogenesis was part of the theory of evolution until it was written off it by Huxley due to Pasteur's experiment showing that spontaneous generation was false.

Please state, with references, the theory of evolution as it was written when it contained abiogenesis.

Abiogenesis is implicit in evolution since it denies totally a divine Creator

You have been told before that this is false. That you continue to repeat it means that you are deliberately lying. You, gore3000, are a liar.