The above is a great example of the totally ridiculous statements that evolutionists make when asked to back up their theory. First of all, the above statement is ridiculous because it is evolutionists who claim that a species can transform itself into a different species. I have never proposed such a thing and in fact I deny that such is possible. So in addition to its being a total non-sequitur and an evasion of my challenge, you are really attacking the theory which you are supposedly defending. Let me pose the challenge again in case you (or any other evolutionist) wishes to take it up (which I doubt very much since you all know that evolution cannot explain the following:
those opposed to evolution can find numerous counterexamples of living things that could not have evolved. I gave one above regarding the migrations of butterflies. Let me mention a few more: the platypus, the bat, euglena, the hypominesis wasp, the fugu fish, the bat and the Cambrian species to name a few. Check it out at Evidence Disproving Evolution . All that evolutionists can show for their theory is a self-selected bunch of bones which they have to massage by painting totally uncalled for drawings to support their theory.
This thread is full of examples.