[Last Visible Dog]

Ahh, but you did proclaim I was wrong when I guessed that had had never studied Cosmology either as an undergrad or grad student, so pointing out the specific laws of physics that are violated by "ThinkPlease's" explanation, and how they violate them, should be a piece of cake, unless you really didn't study Cosmology after all.....

No. You are wrong. I said I thought all matter condensed to a pin-point violated laws of physics (and I said I could be wrong). ThinkPlease said no laws are violated and I asked ThinkPlease to example - Now you are telling me I have to support ThinkPlease's position.

The parade of fallacious logic continues. I studied Cosmology in the context of philosophy (my major) not in the context of physics.

[general_re]

The parade of fallacious logic continues

This would be of a different sort of fallacious logic than your own fallacy of equivocation, then? "Evolution", anyone?