A quick review of his prior posts suggests he's basically a troll.
He also seems to have one or two fixations (ranting about how drawing inferences about criminal intent is a form of "mind-reading") and a peculiar "oddness" or incoherence in his remarks that could be indicative of an underlying pathology, though it would be speculative of me to attempt to be more precise.
BTW, note that after proclaiming that the rest of us "know nothing about cosmology" and after specifically challenging the explanation for the origin of the Universe offered by "ThinkPlease" as being a violation of "the known laws of physics," he conspicuously has avoided responding to the follow-up request by "ThinkPlease" at #563 to identify which laws of physics he thinks are being violated.
For someone who would have us believe that he studied cosmology as a undergrad or grad student, it should be a simple matter for him to answer that question, yet he avoids it like the plague.
Such is the modus operandi of the "troll."
So. You are unable to present supporting evidence for your positions so you have to resort to name-calling.
he conspicuously has avoided responding to the follow-up request by "ThinkPlease" at #563 to identify which laws of physics he thinks are being violated.
Well. I don’t claim to be a physicist but all matter in the universe condensed into a pin-point seems to violate most laws of physics – if you think I am wrong (and I just might be), demonstrate I am wrong – do you turn to name-calling like a child.