[Last Visible Dog]

We were NOT discussing cosmology, we were discussing biological evolution, which as you claim, may be PART of cosomology, but cosmology was NOT what we were discussing.

The first message in this thread is about the origin of the universe.

You argue semantics, we argue evolution, BIOLOGICAL evolution, and creationism/ID.

Funny. All you have done is attack me with semantics. I was not the one desperately trying to differentiate between types of evolution.

[Aric2000]

You still don't get it, but then again, I do not expect you too.

That would be way too much for you I am afraid.

Creationists attack DARWINS theory of evolution, which had NOTHING to say about the origins of the universe.

Since that is what they attack directly with their ID and creationist nonsense, that is what we discuss.

Cosmology may be attacked as well, but it was NOT what we were discussing, until you got here of course, then for some reason NONE of us were on the same wavelength with you, because you DEMANDED that we discuss cosmology, which is NOT what we were discussing.

Therefore you were discussing one thing, and we were discussing something else, you still claimed we were discussing the same thing, even though it was WAY obvious that we weren't.

You continued to say that evolution had to discuss the origins of the universe, and we told you, in no uncertain terms that it did not.

We were discussing 2 different things, and you still refuse to admit that indeed we were discussing 2 different things.

Well, you got this thread loaded with posts if nothing else.

Other then that, you basically made a fool of yourself.