Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: ThinkPlease
Hint: Evolution for the purposes of these discussions usually is defined as "biological evolution" the definition accepted here

The discussions here were relating to cosmology and not biology. Evolution means things evolved - arguing over what evolved seems a bit unnecessary. Also, I never used the “biology” delimiter in my reference to evolution as cosmology. Evolution is a key principle in most theories of cosmology – making all the those “evolution has nothing to do with cosmology” statements that much more absurd.

514 posted on 05/12/2003 4:57:25 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
The discussions here were relating to cosmology and not biology.

Actually, the discussion here is focused evolution in the biological sense, and how it relates to Creationism, specifically how the silly creationist nonsense isn't spreading to other nations. You'd know this if you bothered to read the referenced article.

Evolution is a key principle in most theories of cosmology

That may be, but cosmological change isn't driven by natural selection or random mutation of genetic codes, and its meaning when used cosmologically means more of an orderly progression of events as the Laws of Thermodynamics are followed.

So, since this thread started on a biological theme, your insistence that Evolution be considered as a cosmological event is incorrect and improper, and possibly your understanding of the concepts are weak.

522 posted on 05/12/2003 5:09:27 PM PDT by Ten Megaton Solution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog
The only one not discussing biological evolution WAS YOU!!!..

The rest of us were discussing the Theory of evolution, started by Darwin in 1859. This had to do with Biological evolution.

Not universe evolution, not cosmology, it was, and is, and has been about biological evolution.

It is really bizarre to be called clueless by the one who is actually clueless as to what the ORIGINAL discussion was about.
526 posted on 05/12/2003 5:11:27 PM PDT by Aric2000 (Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog
The discussions here were relating to cosmology and not biology. Evolution means things evolved - arguing over what evolved seems a bit unnecessary. Also, I never used the “biology” delimiter in my reference to evolution as cosmology. Evolution is a key principle in most theories of cosmology – making all the those “evolution has nothing to do with cosmology” statements that much more absurd.

Or as my old undergraduate advisor used to put it, "The only thing constant is change." So what? It's not what was being bandied about before you got here. The subject of this thread was biological Evolution(or big e Evolution)--at least before you got it bogged down in 300 posts of semantical discussion. That has scientifically little to do with BB theory and cosmology. They share a common background of an old universe, but they have little to do with each other--just because you think it has a lot in common does doesn't make it so.

530 posted on 05/12/2003 5:18:06 PM PDT by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson