Skip to comments.
Notre Dame priest: Creationism debate unique to U.S.
The Bozeman Daily Chronicle ^
| 2003-05-11
| Walt Williams
Posted on 05/11/2003 4:38:14 PM PDT by Junior
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900, 901-920, 921-940 ... 1,041-1,055 next last
To: general_re
Thank you for making it an enjoyable evening it was fun destroying your silly disrupter arguments.
To: Aric2000; PatrickHenry
woohoo, I got 900.
Hah, I beat you!! LOL
902
posted on
05/14/2003 9:09:18 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
To: general_re
If I learn french that is evolution ... if I quit drinking --- that is evolution too !
903
posted on
05/14/2003 9:12:04 PM PDT
by
f.Christian
(( the VERY sick mind - won't recognize facts -- REALITY -- probability anymore ! ))
To: Last Visible Dog
In other words, you can't support this notion of "evolution as cosmology", you know you can't support it, and you're going to spare yourself the embarrassment of trying. Hey, you're welcome...
904
posted on
05/14/2003 9:12:09 PM PDT
by
general_re
(No problem is so big that you can't run away from it.)
To: general_re
How is the process of the "evolution of the cosmic structure" similar to the process of biological evolution? What is they are both types of evolution, a gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form
What do I win Alex?
To: general_re
In other words, you can't support this notion of "evolution as cosmology", you know you can't support it, and you're going to spare yourself the embarrassment of trying. Hey, you're welcome... So now you are back to claiming evolution has nothing to do with any theories of the universe in totality (cosmology). Scroll up disrupter, that point was disproved yesterday (many times with many pieces of supporting evidence)
One thing you are - predictable. As soon as your butt is nailed to the wall you change the subject.
To: Last Visible Dog
In other words, you can't support this notion of "evolution as cosmology", you know you can't support it, and you're going to spare yourself the embarrassment of trying. Hey, you're welcome... BTW: how are you doing to address the book I present as evidence that evolution is part of cosmology?
To: Last Visible Dog
What is they are both types of evolution, a gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form Oh, good - more succinctly, they both involve "change". I guess I shouldn't really be surprised, since I predicted exactly this sort of vague handwaving several hundred posts ago. The mechanisms are completely different, just like "building a house" isn't the same process as "building a Hummer", but I suppose it would be crass to interrupt your little touchdown dance by pointing that out...
908
posted on
05/14/2003 9:21:05 PM PDT
by
general_re
(No problem is so big that you can't run away from it.)
To: Last Visible Dog
how are you doing to address the book I present as evidence that evolution is part of cosmology? Well, I figure that once you actually read the thing, you might be armed to present something resembling an argument about how the evolution of cosmic structure is the same process as biological evolution. Until then, it's kind of hard to argue with a title...
909
posted on
05/14/2003 9:22:32 PM PDT
by
general_re
(No problem is so big that you can't run away from it.)
To: Last Visible Dog
883
910
posted on
05/14/2003 9:23:21 PM PDT
by
general_re
(No problem is so big that you can't run away from it.)
To: general_re
WAH!!! I am too right, and I am gonna sit here and hold my breath until you admit it!!!
911
posted on
05/14/2003 9:23:30 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(Are you on Grampa Dave's team? I am!! $5 a month is all it takes, come join!!!)
To: general_re
"evolution as placemarker" placemarker
"fallacy of converse accident" placemarker
"'building a Hummer' is an adverbial clause" placemarker
"exect alluting" placemarker
To: longshadow
generic "making sh*t up" placemarker...
913
posted on
05/14/2003 10:19:55 PM PDT
by
general_re
(No problem is so big that you can't run away from it.)
To: Aric2000
woohoo, I got 900. Hah, I beat you!! LOL Nine as 900 placemarker.
914
posted on
05/15/2003 3:32:36 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: Agamemnon
An "I guess I'm just an idiot" placemarker (why, oh why cannot I not just ignore the apparent contradictions and believe there are none despite the evidence?).
915
posted on
05/15/2003 3:49:13 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
To: general_re
Well, I figure that once you actually read the thing, you might be armed to present something resembling an argument about how the evolution of cosmic structure is the same process as biological evolution. Until then, it's kind of hard to argue with a title... Well Disrupter, you can go right on pretending that evolution is not the key principle in nearly ALL non-religion based cosmological theories. And you can also go on pretending that the word evolution can only mean Darwinism. You are not here to debate or exchange ideas you are here to disrupt.
To: music_code
That is probably true.
To: Aric2000
I don't think so, but I don't know you.
To: Jorge
Is a belief a truth or a lie? Doesn't there have to be some form of proof in order to have a truth or a lie?
To: Dimensio
The whole world intuitively understands that there must be a God. Man suppresses this truth because he is evil, but he cannot quite escape from it either.Right. It really helps that you don't have to do anything but assert this. This way, you can claim to be right without having to pony up any evidence.
You're intellectually bankrupt. Your position is completely without merit. You have no means of demonstrating that what you say is truth.
Perhaps this will help:
1. Some things undeniably exist.
2. My non-existence is possible.
3. Whatever has the possibility not to exist is currently caused to exist by another.
4. There cannot be an infinite regress of current causes of existence.
5. Therefore, a first uncaused cause of my current existence exists.
6. This uncaused cause must be infinite, unchanging, all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-perfect.
7. This infinitely perfect being is appropriately called "God".
8. Therefore, God exists.
9. This God who exists is identical to the God described in the Christian Scriptures.
10. Therefore, the God described in the Bible exists.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900, 901-920, 921-940 ... 1,041-1,055 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson