Are you sure less debate is the best road to a free republic?
By the way, looks like Darth Sideous of the LibertyPost forum is looking to give Registered a little competition.
Love this promo:
Debate is not the same as nutcases who want to disrupt. It's like hecklers at a debate. They are like psychotic children or people who just want to destroy. It is completely different from honest debate.
Let's put it this way, UBE - I was monitoring Maher's new show Real Time two nights ago. He had on two liberals and Ann Coulter.
It's impossible to conduct a debate with blithering idiots who've been taught by the government schools and the liberal media that facts are immaterial to a debate.
The three Leftists were talking about the Constitution, and it was quite clear that they had NO idea what they were talking about. And it didn't matter.
There is a major difference in "debate" and in "trash Bush because he has not solved every problem and because it 'looks' like he will cave on xxxxxxxxxx".
Debate is interesting - trashing is not.
I use to woefully complain that all my efforts were spent on FR protecting Bush from other "conservatives(?)". We then did nothing to combat the liberals that were going on unopposed to bring this country down.
Would be nice if we anti-liberals fought liberals - not other conservatives to protect the best president we have had since Reagan. Why is Jim required to provide a site that allows conservatives to destroy this president and enable the liberals to again get power?
Why do the ex-FR people so resent the loss of their ability to tear down Bush? Why is it they so need to destroy this president for not being the unelectable man they want?
Why is it essential for them to use FR to mount their campaign of destruction to Republicans? Are we that respect and like Bush to be the only ones searching for another site?