This was a press release put out solely for the purpose of PUBLICLY disaassociating themselves from NAMBLA - it was a publicity stunt. It was because a group of pro-homo organizations was getting involved in the UN in some way and it turned out that NAMBLA was in the umbrella group. This raised a little concern even in the UN. So in order to worm their way into the UN, GLAAD had to publicly disavow their affilitation or connection with NAMBLA.
Question - why do you so slavishly and fawningly try to prove that homosexuals are not predators of the young even when all the evidence is to the contrary? Hmmm?
This was a press release put out solely for the purpose of PUBLICLY disassociating themselves from NAMBLA - it was a publicity stunt.
How do you know this? Are you in so tight with GLAAD and other gay rights organizations that you know all the behind the scenes action? You know that these people are secretly supporting NAMBLA and sex with minors yet make public statements condemning NAMBLA as repugnant...just for PR purposes?
Sorry..if that was the case then NAMBLA could easily expose their duplicity.
The idea that you claim to know more about these gay groups than their public statements is rather curious. Can you explain your inside info?
You'd think he would realize just how soundly his homo propaganda attempts have been defeated, and at least shut up and try to cut his losses.
In medieval days, Satan was depicted as a rabid dog, chasing and biting his own tail.
What an appropriate image for Jorge's pathetic efforts here on this thread...he doesn't even realize he's only hurting himself and his cause in the eyes of all the readers of this forum (with the exception of his 3 or 4 Amen corner alter egos here lately, of course.)
I never argued that some homosexuals do not prey on the young...just as some heterosexuals do.
I just pointed out the error made by homophobic bigots who claim sex with minors is an integral and common aspect of the average homosexual life.
That is nonsense.