In the early 70's - I think 72 - when homo activists had one of their initial meetings to figure out their agenda, they wanted to abolish the age of consent. But it looked bad later, so they changed it to just lowering the age of consent. They want to lower it gradually.
NAMBLA is prohibited from taking part in so-called "gay pride parades"(which allow almost any kind of gross behavior) and almost nobody in the gay rights movement will have anything to do with such groups.
This is solely for PR and I don't even accept that it is true. My husband lived in SF for years and ran into a couple of "Gay Pride" parades - and saw men barely dressed in leather carrying little boys with chains around their necks and pulling them by leashes, some had NAMBLA signs. NAMBLA has kind of gone underground from what I understand but it is commonly known that homosexuals are often attracted to sex with young people down to pre-adolescents. Evidence? Homosexuals going in large numbers to countries where there are many child prostitues - like the Philippines. Thailand, etc. Remember a movie a few years ago called something like "Soldier's Story"? I lived in SF at the time. It was promoted as a LOVE STORY between a man in his 20's and a 12 year old boy. There's tons of more evidence but this is a tiny start.
Though statistics show there are more heterosexual pedophiles, this is because heterosexuals make up most of the population. So I wouldn't be surprised if there was a higher percetage of pedophiles among homosexuals...but the idea that "chickenhawking" is a prominent part of the general homosexual population is a ridiculous claim.
You admit that there "may be" more pedophile homos than heteros because there is so much hard evidence that this is so. The numbers I've seen are something like 35- 45% of molestations are men on boys and homosexuals are around 2% of the popluation so figure it out. Then to say that chickenhawking isn't prominent?
In the early 70's - I think 72 - when homo activists had one of their initial meetings to figure out their agenda, they wanted to abolish the age of consent. But it looked bad later, so they changed it to just lowering the age of consent. They want to lower it gradually.
Can you show me any documented evidence...any statements from gay rights organizations to support this?
I haven't seen it..except from NAMBLA which is an extremist fringe group.
And of course there are some heterosexuals promoting the same garbage.
Statements I've seen from gay organizations explicitly oppose the agenda of NAMBLA and those promoting sex with minors.