[breakem]

I don't propose a law for everything I don't like. You don't get it, yet? Don't you really know the difference between disagreeing with something and outlawing it?

The law doesn't stop many who want to engage in such behavior. So now what, prison at $25,000+ of tax money per year, for what.

Here's a tangent, notice how the drug laws have dissuaded people, LOL! Get serious.

[jwalsh07]

I don't propose a law for everything I don't like. You don't get it, yet? Don't you really know the difference between disagreeing with something and outlawing it?

Nor do I. What you can't seem to get your arms around is the fact that being against peeking in bedrooms and being against judicial activism from on high are not mutually exclusive.

would it be possible for you to try and stop laughing long enough to wrap your arms around that?

[jwalsh07]

LOL, you failed to answer the question at hand. Why is incest, a consensual act between adults, abhorent to you? Being abhorent, it must also be immoral to you. That's what legislators do dude, the legislate morality. There are no laws made which don't have moral componenets because otherwise there would be no laws.

I'm well aware that community standards are abhorent to you and that if you were King you would forbid the passing of any law regarding same.

I, on the other hand would, like the founders and Constitution give those people the freedom to live how they choose.

You're a closet fascist breakem. It's an affliction that strikes libertines and leftists and the sad part is, they don't even know it.