Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp
Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why? (Click link for background.)
--Dr. Brian Kopp
Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America
5/1/03
A friend of mine is sitting in jail right now, having lived a life of severely self destructive behavior for many years. His current incarceration is for DUI.
From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.
At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age.
I'm personally helping arrange his counseling and legal representation in the lawsuit against his homosexual molestors.
His life has been destroyed by these homosexual predators, yet many here and elsewhere have the unmitigated gall to castigate those of us battling this homosexual juggernaut, especially in regards to the efforts of the GOP to court the homosexual vote.
This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.
And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, there will be no trial, only a burial.
Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years.
And the same types who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our children, as chickenhawking is an integral part of its culture. Homosexuals do not reproduce. They are not "born that way." But they do recruit. They are actively trying to recruit your children and mine.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system.
Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.
Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases.
Mankind knows that highly promiscuous sexual behavior of any kind brings with it high morbidity and mortality. Homosexual behavior is inherently promiscuous, as every single sociological study on the subject has repeatedly proven.
Male homosexual behavior is essentially desirous of methods to literally and figuratively swim upstream to the sources of that human waste, with as many different partners as humanly possible.
Therefore, homosexual behavior is deadly and definitely decreases the homosexual's life expectancy, and the visceral repulsion it engenders is a natural, wholesome, and common sense response.
Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.
An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
This is my answer to the question, "Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why"
As long as this homosexual juggernaut looms over us, pro-family and all men of good will, desirous of defending and spreading the Culture of Life, will engage the battle and fight this integral and insidious piece of the Culture of Death.
Did you or did you not PING us here?
Of course you did.
Why are you now whining about what you got?
Was your previous incarnation banned for starting flame wars?
Yep.....YOU didn't want to stir up trouble....uh huh. Nice try. I think that one just got you another demerit upstairs.
Evidently not.
To: reasonseeker
Are you comparing homosexuality to Christianity?
221 posted on 05/03/2003 1:02 PM EDT by Jael (The WE? It's "WE the people". You know, of "In order to form a more perfect union" fame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Yes, sweetie, and we all believe you too.
The moderators always remove the posts of innocent victims defending themselves against slanderous lies.
Or so they say at the anti-Freeper sites.....
Answered here.
I just had a vague memory of this poster.
Most posters on this thread agree that homosexual acts are sinful, but they just disagree on how to deal with homosexuals in the political arena.
There is no reason to call each other names, since political discussions are better held by rational arguments, not childish flame wars.
#446: Who's with President Bush?
To: Jael
Which six sodomites did Bush appoint instead of good loyal conservatives?
I'm still waiting to hear you explain what one's sexual practices have to do with one's political principals.
Do you not think there are homosexuals who favor limited government?
MUST one be a Christian to be a conservative? Are Jewish people allowed in your Konservative Klub?
446 posted on 02/19/2003 8:54 PM EST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Some advice, you had better think twice before you ever compare God's chosen people, the Jews, to a sexual deviant.
That is sick.
470 posted on 02/19/2003 9:08 PM EST by Jael (Thy Word is Truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Patience? Me? (Allow me to introduce myself. We obviously haven't met yet. LOL)
This is a good example of the kind of person Free Republic does NOT need. Considering that Jael pinged her know opponents here and then pulls this crap is more than ridiculous.
I, for one, am sick of it and I'm not alone.
It works something like this: Ping a bunch of people you've argued with in the past (and dishonestly, I might add), make dig at them in your post, then accuse them of trying to start a flame war and portray yourself as a victim.
In the meantime, knowlingly lie your ___ off to try to frustrate them.
It's a despicable tactic, and the one who practices it would have to be pretty damned bold (or counting on them not paying close enough attention) to think the mods wouldn't see right through it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.