Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp
Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why? (Click link for background.)
--Dr. Brian Kopp
Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America
5/1/03
A friend of mine is sitting in jail right now, having lived a life of severely self destructive behavior for many years. His current incarceration is for DUI.
From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.
At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age.
I'm personally helping arrange his counseling and legal representation in the lawsuit against his homosexual molestors.
His life has been destroyed by these homosexual predators, yet many here and elsewhere have the unmitigated gall to castigate those of us battling this homosexual juggernaut, especially in regards to the efforts of the GOP to court the homosexual vote.
This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.
And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, there will be no trial, only a burial.
Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years.
And the same types who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our children, as chickenhawking is an integral part of its culture. Homosexuals do not reproduce. They are not "born that way." But they do recruit. They are actively trying to recruit your children and mine.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system.
Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.
Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases.
Mankind knows that highly promiscuous sexual behavior of any kind brings with it high morbidity and mortality. Homosexual behavior is inherently promiscuous, as every single sociological study on the subject has repeatedly proven.
Male homosexual behavior is essentially desirous of methods to literally and figuratively swim upstream to the sources of that human waste, with as many different partners as humanly possible.
Therefore, homosexual behavior is deadly and definitely decreases the homosexual's life expectancy, and the visceral repulsion it engenders is a natural, wholesome, and common sense response.
Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.
An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
This is my answer to the question, "Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why"
As long as this homosexual juggernaut looms over us, pro-family and all men of good will, desirous of defending and spreading the Culture of Life, will engage the battle and fight this integral and insidious piece of the Culture of Death.
You're right it isn't. the implication is that Santorum and other conservatives wish to lock up homosexuals. As far as antorum goes, it's a lie. I can't speak for the rest as I don't know their positions.
If that's not what you meant, then elucidate a bit or remain cryptic. It's up to you.
This wave of pro-homosexual posts & threads makes much more sense now..
Can't you find anything more praiseworthy to defend? Are you really that emotionally challenged and hijacked?
Yeah, seemed just a bit queer, eh? ;-)
The horror and tragedy of 100 million headstones of AIDS victims would not persuade them. They just blink dully, obfuscate, and raise the defense cry even louder.
If that's not what you meant, then elucidate a bit or remain cryptic. It's up to you.
It's simple if you read what I wrote. Santorum left the possibility open that he could be for arresting adults for homosexual and adulterous activities in private.
He could easily have cleared up this controversy by clarifying himself.
Absolutely correct. Romans chapter one describes the dynamics perfectly. They've simply given themselves over entirely to sin. I'm always amazed (but thankful) for those cases where people have actually repented and walked away from homosexuality--but it is pure grace when it happens.
His position is that an unfettered right to privacy necessarily means that all private acts between consenting adults is also a right.
His position is further that there is no Constitutional right anywhere to be found and as such the matter is left to the states.
Furthermore, he made clear that he finds the homosexual act abhorent but does not hate homosexuals.
Finally, it has been brought to my attention that most homosexuals find consensual sex that is incestual abhorent. Presumably they would want the states and the people to be able to legislate regarding same.
And finally there are thirteen states remaining with sodomy laws on the books but prosecutions are as rare as blue moons. Howeve, that is the will of the people in those states.
Should SCOTUS find absolute privacy rights in the penumbra while legislating from the bench again, the unintended consequences of Roe and Bolton will again rear up and bite everyone in the ass.
Judicial activism that advances your ideology is still judicial activism.
His position is that an unfettered right to privacy necessarily means that all private acts between consenting adults is also a right.
That's nonsense. Nobody believes that the right to privacy justifies and all activities...no matter how hideous.
That's simple minded.
The fact is I am clear on the topic...I know what I believe. Santorum is in the middle of this controversy because he has not made his position clear.
Does he believe police should be able to arrest people for adultery and homosexuality in their bedrooms?
All he had to do is answer that question and it would have cleared a lot up.
Not to be cruel but you are simple minded. Either consensual adults have an absolute right to privacy protected by the Constitution or they don't.
Which is it?
PS you can read me on other threads if you'd care to learn about other subjects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.