None on point.
How you got that out of all the "unalienable Right" and "no free man shall be debarred the use of arms" is something only a Tibetan monk has the patience to contemplate.
You have still, after more than 1100 posts, not even come close to pointing out anything that gives any government the power to charge a person like in the lead article with a firearms possession crime.
Home owner.
In his home.
Openly carrying a firearm.
Legally purchased.
No criminal record on the home owners part.
The real criminal was INSIDE the mans house in his daughters room.
Not actively part of a State militia and therefore not subject to active militia regulation, even by your own sources and admission.
You remain sourceless, clueless, and brainless. Beg your idiot responses elsewhere.