There is now a thread up on FR ( no, I don't do links ) which thoroughly decimates your simple minded position, as well as specifically proving my position. Shall I ping you to it ?
You think that it's only FAIR, that women die, if men are going to . Is that IT ?
BTW, female officers is , in a very large extent, due to affirmative action / PC garbage.
In REAL life, females now out number males, who are accepted to / graduate from colleges / universities.
In REAL life, males pay scales, exceed females, due, in large part to the " mommy tack ".
I could go on; however, you don't do anything but ignore facts.
The sourced " data ", which you post, comes from one man's whacky book. It's NOT much more than cherrypicked stats, twisted around to comply with his agenda; and your's.
You think that it's only FAIR, that women die, if men are going to. Is that IT?
No that is not what I am saying. You can't seem to understand that his whole argument is refuting the feminist agenda. You are so set in your idea that I'm a feminist that you can't see that.
BTW, female officers is , in a very large extent, due to affirmative action / PC garbage.
NO kidding. And your point? I believe his was that affirmative action was not fair to the males. Do you disagree with that?
In REAL life, females now out number males, who are accepted to / graduate from colleges / universities. In REAL life, males pay scales, exceed females, due, in large part to the " mommy tack ".
Neither of which would I argue against. The fact that you think I would shows how you have misunderstood what I was arguing for.
I could go on; however, you don't do anything but ignore facts.
You haven't stated any that you can back up with numbers let alone cite sources. I've given numbers and a source. I can give his sources too if you would like. You would find reason to disagree with those as well though.