Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
I think the way women served in WWII was quite adequate and productive.

The military from bottom to top does not exist to provide women a "proving ground"

Lest you think I believe women are incapable of warrior mentality as well as warrior combat fighting, let me be the first to suggest that Maggie Thatcher would suit me fine as a war leader....Jeane Kirkpatrick as a wartime SOS would have been great too....there would have been no willy nilly groveling for the UN or French that's for sure.

My apologies to Happy Gal;>) on the Maggie accolades...but that's another argument.
173 posted on 03/29/2003 11:45:05 PM PST by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
Did someone mention Maggie Thatcher?

War daddy, can we not do this of a Sunday? *L*

181 posted on 03/29/2003 11:50:47 PM PST by Happygal (I'm sure there is a biblical passage to support my view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy
The military from bottom to top does not exist to provide women a "proving ground" I agree and I've never argued for women in the military from that standpoint. Nor is it a "proving ground" for men. If women are in the military it should be because our military can use their talents. Ditto for men.
193 posted on 03/30/2003 12:06:13 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson