Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Read the decision and explain how it supports your broad brush claim. Remember, this was YOUR source, not mine. If you can't find the part of the USSC decision that supports your decision, then just say so.

Dodging is YOUR thing, Roscoe, not mine.

395 posted on 03/13/2003 10:22:03 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
"This line of cases establishes the general proposition that a juror may not be challenged for cause based on his views about capital punishment unless those views would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath. The State may insist however, that jurors will consider and decide the facts impartially and conscientiously apply the law as charged by the court." -- Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980)

397 posted on 03/13/2003 10:35:21 AM PST by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson