Replies

But all states must conform to our BOR's
I tire of repeating the source, - our Constitution, Art VI Sec 2 & 3.
-tpaine-

Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

No mention of jury nullification there.
-roscoe- begs again

Of course there isn't, you clownish twit:
--- Those are the sections specifying that states are bound to honor the Constitution & BOR's, as the supreme law of the land.
Whatta joke you've become roscoe.

Those are the sections specifying that states are bound to honor the Constitution & BOR's

False, question beggar.

The constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual states. Each state established a constitution for itself, and, in that constitution, provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their interests. The powers they conferred on this government were to be exercised by itself; and the limitations on power, if expressed in general terms, are naturally, and, we think, necessarily applicable to the government created by the instrument. They are limitations of power granted in the instrument itself; not of distinct governments, framed by different persons and for different purposes.
USSC, Barron v. Baltimore, 7 Pet. 243 1833