Because this particular area is based on absolutely absurd assumptions. It is an attempt to make the absurd sound scientific. It is not dissimilar to the positive spin put on Clinton's criminal behavior.
Life does not arise from non-life. This is scientific fact. The contrary cannot be demonstrated nor can a semi-believable explanation of how it supposedly happened be developed.
Spontaneous generation, science tells us, is an old wives' tale. Yet this old wives' tale persists in the name of science.
The chances of life arising by itself are less than statistical zero science tells us. Yet it is believed because the only alternative is that God created and that is unacceptable. What kind of reasoning is that? It is nothing but denial of the probable and adhering to the impossible in order that certain implications be avoided.
That's not science, it's not logic, it's not honesty. It's cowardice, lies and willful ignorance. (Please note I am speaking of the theory of abiogenesis and not you personally.)
If you have already decided this to be impossible, than I guess it is and there is nothing I can do to convince you otherwise. I don't buy that it is impossible for the processes of life to begin in the manner suggested. With plenty of energy available the formation of organic chemicals has been shown to be possible. The organization into more complex self-replicating molecules is not completely understood, but is not mathmatically impossible.
Here's my big point of the day: The Theory of Evolution does NOT disprove or in any way contradict the existence of God, or suggest that God could not have had a subtle influence in the creation and development of life on Earth. If you take the Bible as completely literal, then this is not possible, but we can never agree then and we might as well give up the argument. If you accept that the Bible teaches TRUTH instead of FACT then I do not understand the problem in suggesting that the mechanism by which God created life is evolution. This does not contradict ANY of the current evidence, allows current Evolutionary theory to stand as is, and reconciles both with faith in God as creator of the human race. Evolution is NOT anti-God, and there are INNUMERABLE Christians of deep faith who take this approach. Abiogenesis is proposed as a theory because it fits with currently available evidence, NOT because it is an alternative to God somehow.
PLEASE let me know what you think of this. I think this a critical part of this debate and it never gets discussed.