Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
However, they have a response. Everything that supports evolution is fake. No need for them to worry about the "voodoo" of radiometric dating. To them, it's just a convenient mystery that we admit Piltdown was a fake.

Paradoxically, Piltdown Man didn't support evolution. Therefore, it should have been real.

963 posted on 03/19/2003 7:15:38 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 961 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Paradoxically, Piltdown Man didn't support evolution. Therefore, it should have been real.

So many devious paths for a creationoid to take. But if they support Piltdown, it would mean that for the first time in the sorry, shabby history of creationism, they could claim to have some actual "evidence" on their side. They wouldn't know what to do with it. Because if they had one shred of evidence, people would then ask them why they didn't have anything else. Much better to be "intellectually pure" and to have no evidence at all.

964 posted on 03/19/2003 7:26:28 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson