Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
If time was not relevant why mention it?

Time is relevant, as "order" on a cladogram is chronological order. It's a historical narrative. For a better understanding of cladograms and why there are competing ones, try a Workshop on Biosystematics.

More on cladistic principles in Character Analysis. It's a narrative constructed entirely from character traits themselves. The results tend to correlate to a with the observed appearances in the fossil record. Nevertheless, it's not unthinkable that that they won't always. The fault may be suspected in the fossil record, but the cladogram isn't gospel. In fact, the links were obtained by a Yahoo! on "competing cladograms." Note that the fossil record is viewed as an interesting external test for evaluating dueling cladograms.

957 posted on 03/19/2003 6:29:03 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Time is relevant, as "order" on a cladogram is chronological order.

No it is not! In the case we are discussing the "feather" evidence is placed ~22 million years prior to the dating of the fossil bearing that evidence.

959 posted on 03/19/2003 6:39:25 AM PST by AndrewC (Jello™ is suing Darwininians for patent infringement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 957 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson