Yep when data contrary to what Darwininians believe is incomplete it is a weakness. When there is a hole in the data that Darwininans believe it is quickly filled in with something "imaginary". That is just a rephrasing of -- If I tie A and B together then the common point exists. The fact is Archie is still older than any other feathered fossil and the feathers it has are fairly advanced. There are other creatures with possible feathers but these are deemed plant fronds because to consider them feathers would put a big crimp in the Darwininian view of things. Again, the fact is Archie is older than any other feathered fossil.
When there's a hole in the fossil record, it's proof of creation and disproof of evolution. Until it is filled. Then it doesn't mean a thing, as now the proof of creation and disproof of evolution is one of the other holes.