"Still you have no problem calling for her head and besmerching anyone else..."
I have done nothing of the kind, but obviously the knee-jerk (emphasis on "jerk") response of Creationism is alive and well.
"Please let us in on the mountains of evidence for the evolution of flight. Remember use your own words and be specific".
It is not me but thee who is full of rancor and hatred. You are comfortable in your ignorance and I will not disturb the sound slumber of your neurons. Creationists have demonstrated time after time on these threads that they refuse to consider the evidence, therefore, go in peace. We can debate this ad infinitum at the Savior's feet...after He tells you He followed all His own laws during the creation of the Universe...oh, except for Earth. On that planet, His laws never applied. Thorium and rubidium have half-lives of 3 days, yet are constructed so as to fool all the scientists. And He created fossils on a whim after a long day of dotting the stars about the night sky just so we would have something pretty to look at. Nevermind functionality, He did it all just for us, just so He could trap thousands of individuals and condemn them to the fires of Hell for having the audacity to believe the Earth was more than 10,000 years old. Creationism is a point of Salvation, evidently. Well you have to believe Jesus died for your sins, but more importantly you have to believe God made everything in 6-24 hour periods of time. Or else. < /sarcasm>
You guys are priceless.
Don't waste my time flattering yourself with what a great guy you are. I asked you to describe in your own words the evolution of flight and you failed to do so.
As for your claims of sainthood save it for the judgment day
It is not me but thee who is full of rancor and hatred. You are comfortable in your ignorance and I will not disturb the sound slumber of your neurons.
I doubt if the Lord Jesus will take kindly to your name calling in light of fact that you are completely ignorant of who I am, what I have learned, what I have discovered and where I am going. Save the preaching for someone who believes the same half science hocus-pocus you do. I gave my life to Christ 27 years ago at a Young Life retreat. I studied engineering at Purdue Unit and that is where I first began to question evolution. To this day no evolutionist has provided any overwhelming or even under whelming evidence to support their view. You will be no exception as there is no truth to the theory you hold to. Macroevolution does not exist. You have another problem though in your claim to Christianity in that you now have to explain how death entered into the world before Adam and Eve came into existence. Of course you can say that Genesis is just an allegory but then why not Moses and Jesus. Your smarmy responses are not going to do it either.
As far your insinuation that I am "jerk" (emphasis on "jerk") you might want to read the Sermon on the Mount that would be Matthew 5,6&7 in the New Testament.
Now on to the "Preponderance of Evidence" as presented by Lee.
He tells you He followed all His own laws during the creation of the Universe...oh, except for Earth. On that planet, His laws never applied. Thorium and rubidium have half-lives of 3 days, yet are constructed so as to fool all the scientists. And He created fossils on a whim after a long day of dotting the stars about the night sky just so we would have something pretty to look at. Never mind functionality, He did it all just for us, just so He could trap thousands of individuals and condemn them to the fires of Hell for having the audacity to believe the Earth was more than 10,000 years old. Creationism is a point of Salvation, evidently. Well you have to believe Jesus died for your sins, but more importantly you have to believe God made everything in 6-24 hour periods of time. Or else.
As I said earlier, this is yet another under whelming attempt to make an argument for the indefensible. You make absolutely no clear points and provide no facts.
Rubidium has 11 isotopes with half lifes ranging from Rb 85 being a stable isotope to Rb 82 having a half life of 2.25 minutes. However none of the isotopes have a half life a three days. Thanks for proving your ignorance of chemistry. I guess I should believe evolution on account of that?
Well maybe not let's got to the next preponderance of evidence the "Fossil Record". I love this one you guys always claim that there it is the slam dunk of all arguments and yet after over a hundred years of digging and the billions of known fossils there is not one single example of a transitional species when there should be almost nothing but transitional species. What a hoot!
Well you did get one thing right; the Truth like the Word of God is "Priceless"
Kindest regards,
Boiler Plate