They keep bringing up the Pasteur thing. Months ago, over and over, we linked to scholarly discussions of Pasteur's work. Once I even linked to the Pasteur Institute in Paris. Countless times this "Pasteur proof" that abiogenesis is impossible has been debunked. Any creationoid who has been here for a few months has already been shown the error of that argument. Many times. Yet it keeps coming back. These "creation science" people are impossible to deal with. Utterly impossible.
Really? Where is the part of the article proving it wrong? Care to post it? Pasteur showed that spontaneous generation was false. Thomas Huxley was forced to write off abiogenesis from the theory of evolution because of Pasteur's proof. So yes, Pasteur's experiment is a great part of the proof against abiogenesis. However, we have received much more proof since then which I detailed in my post and which none of you, in spite of having posted that proof against abiogenesis almost a year ago, have been able to refute. Since I know you folks are very lame, here is a link to the post# 768 and the rest of the refutation of abiogenesis which you and your friends refuse to address.