Note that your very link preemptively dismisses using "Evolution is a fact" and "Evolution is a theory" to prove "theory = fact."So what? I was not trying to prove theory=fact. I was showing mr. b as wrong. He gave a partial answer. He was wrong. Darwininians use these distinctions for wiggle room. What is the fact of evolution.(in a meaningful way, not in the sense of a change which is undoubtedly the use you will offer)
Undoubtedly. The task of discussing evolution without mentioning some sort of change does seem rather daunting. Change, yes, and common descent. What did
your link say about the fact part of evolution? That would seem like a good starting point for the curious. So would the
29 Evidences linked ten posts previous to your question.
Out for a bit.