To: Junior
[An idiot, therefore, is a person who continues to stand by an opinion by ignoring or knowingly misrepresenting evidence.] Pretty much sums up at least one poster on these threads. What a coincidence. I was thinking of him as the poster boy for that end of the debate spectrum.
841 posted on
03/18/2003 8:40:20 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: PatrickHenry
You have to consider: which side consistently takes quotes out of context and misrepresents the evidence? Which side uses half-truths and outright lies to convince the uninformed of the rightness of their claims? The fact that creationists must rely on such dishonest tactics speaks of the weakness of their claims.
849 posted on
03/18/2003 9:21:27 AM PST by
Junior
(Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson