To: balrog666; AndrewC; Dataman; Con X-Poser; gore3000; Jael
BR,
So it is your understanding, that in science, when you can not prove your theory, it is incumbent on others to provide an alternate?
Reagards,
Boiler Plate
To: Boiler Plate; balrog666; AndrewC; Con X-Poser; gore3000; Jael
Posted by Boiler Plate to balrog666; AndrewC; Dataman; Con X-Poser; gore3000; Jael
On The Smokey Backroom ^ 03/17/2003 11:09 PM CST #815 of 821 ^ BR,
So it is your understanding, that in science, when you can not prove your theory, it is incumbent on others to provide an alternate?
Reagards,
Boiler Plate
Exactly right. I should give this phenomenon a name, The Reversal of the Burden of Proof.
Shift the burden of proof from the new idea or from the more elaborate explanation:Assume your position to be right until proved wrong;
Assume the opposition to be wrong until proved right.
This is just one more of the unspoken assumptions put forth by our consistent friends.
824 posted on
03/18/2003 6:19:37 AM PST by
Dataman
To: Boiler Plate; ThinkPlease; balrog666
So it is your understanding, that in science, when you can not prove your theory, it is incumbent on others to provide an alternate? [emphasis added]
Unbelieveable.
Absolutely unbelieveable.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson