[longshadow]

Just to make sure before I reply, do you honestly believe the above statements to be fact and that you aren't being satirical? I don't want to put words into your mouth. [you; to ThinkPlease; emphasis added]

Quoting from "ThinkPlease", which you included in your reply to him:

The preponderance of the evidence shows that: ..... [snip]. These statements are not immutable, and can be changed by a preponderance of the evidence in the favor of a new model, provided it explains the behavior of the world better than any of the old models listed above.

Far be it for me to speak for "ThinkPlease" but which words in the phrases "a preponderance of evidence" and "These statements are not immutable....." do you not understand?

[Boiler Plate]

Far be it for me to speak for "ThinkPlease" but which words in the phrases "a preponderance of evidence" and "These statements are not immutable....." do you not understand?

LS,

I just want to make absolutely sure, as this has been a problem before. Thanks for asking though.

Best Regards,
Boiler Plate

[PatrickHenry]

What part of "placemarker" do you not understand?

[gore3000]

which words in the phrases "a preponderance of evidence" and "These statements are not immutable....."

Think please understands quite well that rhetoric, which is what the above is, is not fact. He was asking for facts, for evidence, something which the evolutionists refuse to give.