In your previous post to me you gave me "opinions" and you did not state any "facts" in support of your "conclusion". You also don't know if I support the theory or parts of the theory etc. but you decide to lump me in with everyone anyway.
I am not talking about biologists, chemists, etc.. Most of them are real scientists and they do not care a hoot about evolution.
Wow!! Another strawman argument.
Wow!! Another strawman argument.
No, the argument is that you cannot call all scientists evolutionists because evolution is not science which was the point of my post. It was you who made the strawman that all scientists are evolutionists. Kindly address my point instead of calling everything a strawman argument. Here it is again in case you care to address it:
They care about the truth and that is why they ignore evolution. Evolution has not led to any scientific achievements because evolution, as I have said many times is ANTI-SCIENCE. The central point of science is the discovery of causes and effects and materialist evolution denies it. It proposes random events as the engine of the transformation of species. This is totally unscientific, it is an attack on science which in order to expand human knowledge and human health and living standards needs to find the causes and effects of how our Universe functions. Randomness answers nothing and leads to no discoveries. In fact it opposes scientific inquiry and is a philosophical know-nothingism. That is why evolution has been popular with the masses and virtually ignored by scientists. It is pseudo-science for morons. With a few words such as 'survival of the fittest' and 'natural selection' it seeks to make idiots think they are knowledgeable.