[narby]

She was questioning the obvious flaws in evolution.

I can easily question the flaws in attacking Iraq. But that doesn't mean that I believe that it's not the best action right now.

There's details of evolution plenty worth studying. But to question it's fundimental existence? Sure, and 2 + 2 just MIGHT equal 5 in some parallel universe.

[ican'tbelieveit]

I am glad that Columbus questioned the fundamental existence of the world being flat. I am glad that many THINKING people question things, without just accepting them. I have questioned the situation in Iraq too. I believe we are making the right decision, but I still questioned it. Questions are what make the world go round.

And the theory of evolution, as it exists now, needs to be questioned. In fact, many thoughts about the theory of evolution have changed as people research and question. So why was it wrong for this professor to do so?