Our board of regents, fortunately, disagrees with you.
You cannot support your assertions, (re. the theory of evolution), with rigorous science. That is indeed the crux of this discussion.
I was going to call this an attempt at proof by repeated assertion, but why mince words? It's a lie; I've done this over and over again.
You toe the "party line", (re. the theory of evolution), you have to, or you wouldn't have a job teaching.
I'm employed as a physical chemist; I could believe anything I want about evolution; it would have very little impact on most of what I teach. One of the few really good scientists the creationist crowd holds up as an evolution skeptic is in the same field as I, and I'd say most people in the field don't even know what his beliefs are. However, I am considering offering a seminar this fall titled something like 'A chemist looks at evolution'. I'm not going to spend a lot of time skewering creationist fantasies; I'm not paid to teach nonsense, even with the goal of lampooning it; but we may cover it briefly, for light relief.
So you see, this is a labor of love