Your ramble in 401 does not address the question I posed to you, that of why this earlier statement of yours is obviously true:
Of course nothing is known to a 100% certain point. This hurts the evolutionists "proofs" not mine.
You seem to be having a little trouble focusing your thoughts, so let me help you out with some suggestions.
- Maybe you have a hypocritical double standard for evidentiary basis when it comes to evolution and anything else (especially creation).
- Maybe you realize that creationism/ID makes no attempt to be useful or informative about the real world and thus no standard of intellectual rigor even applies.
- Maybe you realize that you have offered no "proofs" (your word) and thus have nothing to support.
- Maybe you realize that you don't give a hoot about science. You just don't like what your preacher doesn't like.
These are just suggestions and are not meant to restrict you from taking another try in any way you chose. I do notice a tendency for creationists to only make an empty show of addressing certain points while in fact extemporizing on semi-related or unrelated topics. This variously makes them look slippery, unfocused, addlepated ... Whatever it is, they get it a lot.