These are the points I am trying to make. There is nothing wrong with bringing these questions forward and discussing them. Why are evolutionists so scared of this?
1) Junior is talking your ear off on it. 2) The questions are interesting, but creationists routinely argue from gaps in knowledge to gaps in history. The incompleteness (but not lack) of data about an event 65 million years ago is hardly evidence that it didn't happen at all. Holes in the data are holes in the data, not in the historical sequence that produced the data.