[atlaw]

Your comment to RWP: "Aaaahh. Noted for future reference, when consensus and democracy replaces scientific method."

Remedy's original commentary (accompanying his post of the article respecting the maligned professor): "Loosening Darwin's Grip - A poll released in May 2002 by Zogby International found that nearly eight out of every 10 Ohioans supported the teaching of intelligent design in classrooms where Darwinian evolution also is taught. A survey by The Plain Dealer newspaper in Cleveland offered similar findings: 74 percent of Ohioans said evidence for and against evolution should be taught in science classrooms, while 59 percent said intelligent design should be included in origins study."

Pot, meet kettle.

[Sloth]

None of it should be taught... Evolution, so-called Creation "science", ID, etc. -- all smoke and mirrors.

Origins are properly a philosophical subject, not a hard science.