Fine. Show how evolution, if it were true, would cause heat to flow spontaneously from a cold to a hot object, or, alternatively, would cause the total entropy of the earth plus sun spontaneously to decrease.
Be as technical as you want. I can handle the equations.
You imply that I am trying to disprove the theory. My point is that the 2nd Law is an issue for evolutionists rather than creationists. The fact that many evolutionists find it necessary to address the 2nd Law in their defense of evolution demonstrates that.
I don't think this discussion has gotten very technical. This is very basic stuff.
Then you have no point. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies only to closed systems. The Earth's biosphere is not a closed system; it receives energy from the Sun. Therefore, evolution does not defy the Law.
Only because creationists frequently make the stupid and ignorant proposition that the 2nd law somehow forbids evolution. Such as here and here and here. So if I call you a rapist, and you deny it, does that mean that being a rapist is an issue for you, but not for me?
Nothing is an issue for creationists except that, in making worlds, God is not allowed to use a lot of time, common descent of organisms, mutation, or natural selection.