Be worthy of your screen name. The evidence isn't a problem provided it's not the frequent manufactured evidence often called hoaxes. It's the interpretation of the evidence that is the issue.
It's simple. Creationism is a dying theory. Compared to the 1830's and before, there ratio of creationists to non-creationists has dropped rapidly and has stayed consistently low. On the theoretical front, there hasn't been a theory that has been shown to have a shred of evidence in its favor since before Louis Agassiz. The fields of Geophysics and Geology, Biology and Paleontology, and Astronomy and Cosmolgy have grown by leaps and bounds in that very same period of time. Even the theory of Intelligent Design, now a pet theory for a number of Old Earth Creationists, still hasn't been able to form a scientific theory that which experiments can be based on. As I said, it is wishful thinking if you think anything else. Instead, Creationists are forced to plead their cases to corrupt politicians to try to force to have their work taught in school.