To: PatrickHenry
There would definitely be no serial killers; no matter how much two crimes had in common, because no one saw either happening, it would be impossible to claim the same killer was responsible for both.
1,183 posted on
03/24/2003 10:03:58 AM PST by
Junior
(Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
To: Junior
There would be no science of criminology. No reason to look for clues, and no purpose in studying a criminal's modus operandi. After all, things that happened in the past are forever unknowable. Any attempt to figure out what happened would be dismissed as a "just so" story. Think of it -- the whole world walking around like the OJ jury! It's creationism's version of heaven on earth.
1,184 posted on
03/24/2003 10:12:37 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson