Please inform me of your published works and that of your nitpicker friend so that we may do a peer review of your materials.

You probably don't like Dr. William Bennet either. The Moral Czar condemns evolution as a moral compass breaker. His K12 program includes ID to counteract evolution. More "brainwashed", upwardly mobile homeschoolers that will be supplanting your friends in the near future.

You can't know what you are missing when you are ignorant. Biblical literacy is the best medicine for linear thought (box them up they are ready to go). Being a diligent student of the Bible would undoubtedly help you with your Science Fiction authoring success.

Hope you are well!

Please inform me of your published works and that of your nitpicker friend so that we may do a peer review of your materials.

Since you insist, I must ever-so reluctantly report that my only published work is

The Bitter Wells Dude on the Sweetwater,

currently available from Jacobyte Books, a little Aussie web publisher. (I hate doing that since we're not supposed to be using our FR accounts as commercial billboards, but you backed me into a corner.)

If you're going to trumpet that Missler has published more about science than I have, you're right. He's apparently been flat-out grade-school-level wrong in most of it, however.

<< You probably don't like Dr. William Bennet either. The Moral Czar condemns evolution as a moral compass breaker. His K12 program includes ID to counteract evolution. More "brainwashed", upwardly mobile homeschoolers that will be supplanting your friends in the near future. >>

IMMORAL MOTIVES for EVOLUTION:

"I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption ... The philosopher ... is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do... The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom." (Aldous Huxley, "Confessions of a Professed Atheist," Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June, 1966 p. 19 [Grandson of evolutionist Thomas Huxley and brother of evolutionist Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley was one the most influential writers and philosophers of the 20th century.]

Evolutionists admit their motive is to NEGATE GOD:

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." (Richard Lewontin, 'Billions and billions of demons", The New York Review, January 9, 1997, p. 31)

"With this single argument the mystery of the universe is explained, the deity annulled, and a new era of infinite knowledge ushered in." (Ernst Haeckel, "The Riddle of the Universe", 1899, p. 337.)

"Christianity has fought, still fights, and will fight science to the desperate end over evolution, because evolution destroys utterly and finally the very reason Jesus' earthly life was supposedly made necessary. Destroy Adam and Eve and the original sin, and in the rubble you will find the SORRY REMAINS of the SON of GOD. If Jesus was not the redeemer who died for our sins, and this is what evolution means, then CHRISTIANITY is NOTHING." (G.R. Bozarth, "The Meaning of Evolution", American Atheist, 9-78, Vol. 20, p. 30.)