Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666; Con X-Poser; Dataman; AndrewC; gore3000; Jael
I'd be happy to say I've proved you're invincibly ignorant about the nature and philosophy of science. But you did it all by yourself. Have fun wallowing in your little see-no-evolution playground.

Balrog,

Ahh yes, the tried and true "Evo" "Insult when you can't win" strategy. Unfortunately all you have in fact proved is that you don't know anything about science as you repeatedly ignore even grade school text books and misuse definitions that directly contradict what you are trying say. Apparently you view this as some sort of personal war and can not discuss this subject in anything that even remotely resembles civility or intellectuality. Your childish insults only condemn yourself.

Thanks for adding to the prepondurance of evidence that the Evo's provide the overwhelming number of invectives, diatribes and non sensical babble. Kindest Regards,
Boiler Plate

1,084 posted on 03/20/2003 3:05:29 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies ]


To: Boiler Plate
Unfortunately all you have in fact proved is that you don't know anything about science as you repeatedly ignore even grade school text books

Grade school text books are not the most reliable sources of scientific knowledge. I'm sure you know that. Are you just trying to score cheap rhetorical points?

1,087 posted on 03/20/2003 4:04:31 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies ]

To: Boiler Plate
Unfortunately all you have in fact proved is that you don't know anything about science as you repeatedly ignore even grade school text books and ...

Bleeding-edge science isn't conducted by grade school textbook definitions. Can you really not understand that?

You are trying to get us to believe that your version of fantasy science somehow trumps the accepted method used since Roger Bacon.

Yes, exactly. Don't you understand that Popper has changed the definition of what science is by changing it's logical and rational foundations? If not, ask one of your parents to explain it to you.

misuse definitions that directly contradict what you are trying say.

Then show us an example. Or is this just one more of your baseless BS assertions?

Oh, and let's revisit this whopper:

So if you would like to continue to suggest that TOE is valid and true, please provide that time and place of the first succesful abiogenesis experiment and what life form was created in that near famous moment?

Are you willing to admit that the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with abiogenesis?

1,089 posted on 03/20/2003 5:17:06 PM PST by balrog666 (When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson