Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
The great "nature vs. design" debate is ready to begin. See the post above this one for details.
447 posted on 03/26/2003 4:46:14 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Some things in nature apparently favor and follow some basic math such as spirals of various kinds, intersecting triangles, Fibonacci numbers, squaring the circle, the golden mean to a degree. The same math sequences and figures have been used to lay out systems for deciphering nature including the evolved intelligence of man. There are a limitless number of such systems, some used in teaching basic principles, which in turn are an attempt to being conceptual order to the chaos of variety in nature. Wolframs recursive formulae are a very recent attempt along these lines, but others have developed very similar schemes to explain the nature of intelligence and the psychology of mental functioning. Computers are being used to crunch numbers and view the emerging pictures in ever-increasing variety; some of the images so produced look as natural and of biological origin as leaves and fly's eyes.
448 posted on 03/26/2003 5:06:13 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts: Proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Thanks for the heads up, I'll have to grab a box of popcorn and watch, could be interesting. Don't have time for much else, moving into a new house this weekend...
449 posted on 03/26/2003 6:05:35 PM PST by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I don't get it. They are discussing naturally occuring items, some of them made by intelligent agents, e.g., basketball, brick pavers, beehives (arguably not using intelligence but maybe instinct, but still, bees have a version of intelligence), and some made by physical processes that don't involve intelligent thought.

I came in at the middle or end of the conversation and don't really feel like starting at the beginning, if it has something to do with creationism vs. evolution. The creationists haven't been interesting enough to justify my attention yet.
454 posted on 03/26/2003 6:58:37 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Support John Howard - buy Australian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I shouldn't have categorized the items as naturally occuring, that doesn't seem the proper term to use for basketballs and cobblestones.
455 posted on 03/26/2003 7:01:15 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Support John Howard - buy Australian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The great "nature vs. design" debate is ready to begin. See the post above this one for details.

I see the Lucretian Umpire has been diligently conditioning (for at least a day).

508 posted on 03/27/2003 2:55:59 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson