To: Diamond
My mouse has suddenly gone on the fritz here, and keyboarding around FR is not much fun, so I'm sorry for the delay in responding. Anyway, until I replace it this afternoon, why don't you contemplate these objects?
#9
Composed of SiO2 molecules, with trace impurities...
370 posted on
03/19/2003 6:28:24 AM PST by
general_re
(Non serviam.)
To: All
Presumably the war starts today.
God Bless America placemarker
371 posted on
03/19/2003 7:12:43 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: general_re
Thank you, general. Kudos. This one is deep. Very deep. (and fiendishly clever.:^) At the risk of driving everyone away through sheer boredom and inattention, this one will take a little time for research and analysis.
Cordially,
372 posted on
03/19/2003 9:02:40 AM PST by
Diamond
To: general_re
Making a positive abductive inference for #9 is difficult, if not impossible in that the objects pictured could either be the result of physical/chemical necessity, or they could have been caused by an intelligent agency mimicing physical/chemical necessity. At the risk of a false negative, I am unable to reach a positive inference of the design of the objects. So, no design inference.
Cordially,
391 posted on
03/21/2003 8:25:08 AM PST by
Diamond
(actually, the phrase 'good' Presbyterian is a contradiction in terms, doctrinally speaking:^))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson