Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: cornelis
My only intent is to test the design inference on its own merits. From this, we can reasonably infer the worth of the design inference, and the design inference only. To take the usefulness - or lack thereof - of the design inference to be indicative of the worth of any other hypothesis is not a logically tenable position, with the exception of those hypotheses that rely on the validity or non-validity of the design inference as a premise.
20 posted on 03/03/2003 4:45:54 PM PST by general_re (Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
with the exception of those hypotheses that rely on the validity or non-validity of the design inference as a premise.

I recognized from the beginning that you were making exceptions with your language of "the useful." We'll see how it plays out.

21 posted on 03/03/2003 5:20:01 PM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson